The cow in the room – scientists call out BS!

Over 20 scientists have criticized the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) for failing to revise or withdraw their 2023 report on reducing agricultural greenhouse gases. The report downplays the impact of reducing animal foods on emissions, with two cited academics stating it contains "egregious errors" and underestimates emission savings from farming fewer livestock. FAO's chief scientist described the emissions forecast as a "rough estimate", leading to accusations that the report was designed to uphold the status quo of increasing meat production and consumption.

One of the letter's signatories, Jennifer Jacquet, a professor of environmental science and policy, expressed concern over the FAO's methodology and its apparent bias towards supporting meat production. The scientists' criticism highlights the need for accurate and unbiased information on the environmental impact of animal agriculture, and calls for more transparency and accountability from organizations like the FAO in addressing climate change.